Search
Subject Categories:
 Art (445)
 Asperger's (32)
 Blogging (9)
 China and the Han (9)
 eBay (3)
 Education (91)
 Fiction (28)
 Geography (27)
 History (37)
 Humor (46)
 Life (357)
 Mandalas (122)
 Mathematics (1,219)
 Mental Health (72)
 Music (43)
 Mysteries (16)
 Politics (119)
 Quotations (64)
 Religion (58)
 Satire (10)
 Science and Scientists (120)
 Follow RobertLovesPi.net on WordPress.com
MostViewed Posts, Recently:

Recent Posts
Explore RobertLovesPi By Topic
 Arkansas
 Art
 Asperger's
 Aspie
 astronomy
 atheism
 atheist
 chemistry
 chiral
 circle
 cluster
 compound
 cube
 cuboctahedron
 dodecahedron
 dual
 Education
 enneagon
 faceted
 faceting
 geometric
 geometrical
 geometrical art
 geometry
 Golden Ratio
 hexagon
 Humor
 humour
 icosahedron
 icosidodecahedral
 icosidodecahedron
 kite
 life
 mandala
 mandalas
 math
 mathematical
 mathematical art
 Mathematics
 music
 nonagon
 octagon
 octahedron
 op art
 pentagon
 physics
 politics
 polygon
 polyhedra
 polyhedral
 polyhedron
 president
 quotation
 quote
 religion
 rhombic dodecahedron
 rhombicosidodecahedron
 rhombic triacontahedron
 rhombus
 school
 science
 snub dodecahedron
 star
 stellated
 stellation
 symmetry
 tessellation
 tetrahedron
 tiling
 triangle
 Trump
 truncated icosahedron
 USA
 words
 zonohedron
Hit Counter
 302,551 hits
A Venn Diagram of the Real Number System
This entry was posted in Mathematics and tagged counting, integers, irrational, natural, rational numbers, real number, system, Venn diagram, whole. Bookmark the permalink.
Reblogged this on nebusresearch and commented:
I’m aware that it isn’t properly exactly a Venn diagram, now, but the mathematicsartist Robert Austin has a nice picture of the real numbers, and the most popular subsets of the real numbers, and how they relate. The bubbles aren’t to scale — there’s just as many counting numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, et cetera) as there are rational numbers, and there are far more irrational numbers than there are rational numbers — but if you don’t mind that, then, this is at least a nice little illustration.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Regarding the various sets not being to scale, you are absolutely correct. I had to sacrifice any effort to get that for the sake of legibility.
Thank you for pointing these things out; I wouldn’t want anyone to look at this, and then conclude that rationals outnumber irrationals, or any of the other problems you cite. It’s only intended to show which sets are subsets of which others, and that sort of thing.
LikeLike
This is something I can use with one of my students. Thanks for sharing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re quite welcome. You might also ask them what they can find here which is not depicted realistically. The comparative sizes of the sets of rational and irrational numbers is but one such nonrealistic thing in this diagram.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You are miles beyond me, Dr. V. Pi!
LikeLike