Share this:
- Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Nice!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you!
LikeLike
Hi Robert, As always, I enjoy the simplicity of your diagrams and it gives me a great opportunity to discover the story they are telling.
Like a map charts geographical features, geometry also tells a story because it is based on a reality. I look at the patterns based on similar attaching spheres. However, I am having difficulty in deciphering the reality on which the attached diagram is based.
The problem is with the hexagon, although symmetrical in one alignment I would not call it regular as it cannot be inscribed with a circle. As a result, when you try and construct a geometric dual, it is not possible.
Keep up the good work.
David
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, the hexagons are merely equilateral, not equiangular.
LikeLike