A regular polygon has some number of sides (n), and its sides and diagonals form a certain number of triangles (t).

For a triangle, n=3 and t=1.

For a square, n=4. There are four triangles congruent to the one shown in orange, and four more like the one shown in light blue, so adding these gives t=8.

For a pentagon, with n=5, there are five of the purple triangles, five of the green triangles, five of the red triangles, and five of the yellow triangles, for a total of t=20.

For a hexagon, there are two of the orange triangles, six of the yellow ones, twelve of the red ones, six of the light blue ones, twelve of the purple ones, twenty-four of the green ones, twelve of the dark blue ones, six of the grey ones, six of the black ones, twelve of the pink ones, and six of the brown ones. That’s 2+6+12+6+12+24+12+6+6+12+6 = t = 104.

Three yields one, four yields eight, five yields 20, and six yields 104. At the moment, I don’t have the patience to count the triangles in a heptagon, but it would clearly be, well, quite a few.

There may or may not be a formula for this; any pattern eludes me, so far. I am reminded of the alkane series in chemistry: one isomer each of methane, ethane, and propane, two of butane, three of pentane, and so on to 75 for decane, and beyond. All efforts to find a formula for the number of isomers, in terms of the number of carbon atoms, have failed (to date). For now, these are both filed under “unsolved problems.”

**UPDATE: **A friend of mine has shown me that this polygon problem has, in fact, been solved, and he provided this link: http://oeis.org/A006600 — apparently I missed some of the triangles in the pentagon (the red and yellow combined, for example), as well as the hexagon. The correct numbers for those two polygons are 35 and 110, respectively. Aside from this update, I’m not changing the rest, for I need reminders of my own fallibility. This will do nicely.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

## About RobertLovesPi

I go by RobertLovesPi on-line, and am interested in many things. Welcome to my little slice of the Internet.
The viewpoints and opinions expressed on this website are my own. They should not be confused with the views of my employer, nor any other organization, nor institution, of any kind.

Oh wow. This is awesome. You are making me want to try to find a pattern in this! I will keep following your blog, man! Keep up the good work. 😀

LikeLike

Pingback: Inspiring Blogger Award | gaseimasha

there are actually 35 triangles in a pentagon… you are missing some that overlap others that you show… and your yellow doesn’t appear either, I think you are missing some on your hexagon too.

LikeLike

You are correct, as some of my friends on my Facebook told me. When I can find the time to re-do this correctly, I’ll post a link to the new post here. Good eye for detail!

LikeLike

goodness please help me with the formula on how to solve and find the triangles faster than counting it.

LikeLike

and oh yes, there should be a mistake on pentagons triangle

LikeLike

it should be 35 🙂

LikeLike

What’s Happening i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve discovered It

absolutely useful and it has aided me out loads. I’m hoping to

contribute & assist other users like its aided me. Great job.

LikeLike

hooda math

LikeLike

nice work but what is the formula?, is it n(n-3) x 180 degree to find the diagonals and multiplied to 2 to find the triangles or what?.

LikeLike

nice work but what is the formula?, is it n(n-3) x 180 degree to find the diagonals and multiplied to 2 to find the triangles or what?.

LikeLike

by the way thanks for the help 🙂

LikeLike

just waiting for you reply for the formula 🙂

LikeLike

ah helloooo, it has been 1 hour waiting for your reply, if you cant answer it tell me so i can leave your site.

LikeLike

dont feel shy to say you do not know maybe i can help by posting an answer for all the polygons triangles from 3 sides to 10 sides just to help improve your website.

LikeLike

:0

LikeLike

Please feel free to post your answer.

LikeLike