Speculation Regarding Future Human Speciation, Part II

tree

[My first post on this subject appeared here.]

In the future, the human race, homo sapiens, will do what all living organisms do when circumstances change, as they always do, sooner or later. We will adapt, migrate, and/or die. Since this is a post about speciation, I’m mentally setting that part of my brain which worries about extinction happening relatively soon to “hopeful,” for the duration of writing this post.

For speciation to happen, two things must happen first: reproductive isolation, and the passage of a lot of time. Migration (to off-earth colonies, for example) can produce reproductive isolation, but so can other things. As for adaptation, this is done in many ways by our species, consciously, as well as unconsciously. Evolution is always happening, but it is the slowest of all human adaptive processes. It is estimated that it has taken us (and everything else) 3.85 billion years to evolve, after all, and that’s roughly the most recent third of the time since the Big Bang.

Extra-terrestrial colonies would definitely be a huge “push” toward speciation, especially colonies with low gravity, relative to that experienced by other people. As well-described in Robert Heinlein’s novel The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, return to a high-gravity environment, after many years in a low-gravity environment, would carry significant health effects, with serious risks of sever complications, up to, and including, death. If we ever establish colonies outside the solar system, this isolation will become even more extreme, simply due to the enormous distances and travel-times involved.

However, we will speciate, as will all other species, if we stay alive long enough, even if no more of us leave low-Earth orbit.

In my previous post on this subject, I speculated about the emergence of fully-speciated homo lunaris,  homo literaticus, homo illiteraticus, artificially-genetically-modified humans (whom I did not name then, but homo techogeneticus would do nicely), and homo cyberneticus. An increase in the number of infertile offspring between two groups, combined with a falling birthrate between them, persisting over millennia, would be an early warning signal that speciation might be happening — that’s how long this evolutionary process takes.

Given enough time, and increased reproductive isolation from non-“Aspies,” another group which could speciate is the population with Asperger’s, to form homo aspergerus, primarily because of the difficulties each group of people have communicating with the other group. However, I’ve written several posts already which seek to help Aspies and non-Aspies understand, and bridge, the communication-gap. What’s going on here? Simple: evolution is simply a process which happens. It has no ethics. It is neither good nor evil. More to the point, just because I can discern a possible future does not mean I want that possibility to become real.

In what other ways could speciation happen? A widenining gap between the rich and poor certainly seems possible as a “push” towards speciation, at least currently, which could create homo plutocraticus and homo povertus. It is easily possible to imagine this happening along with the emergence of homo cyberneticus.

Another interesting possibility would occur if humanity survived in the North and Southern hemispheres, near the poles, but extreme global warming made tropical regions uninhabitable, and the equator untraversable, or at least very rarely crossed. In this case, it is hard to imagine what direction the changes would take, for they could go in many directions. Names for such Northern and Southern humans could be homo borealis and homo australis, from our point of view. In theirs, of course, as in many of these scenarios, the likely terms each group will use for the other will translate, roughly, as “us” and “them,” unless they somehow manage to shed the primate characteristic of forming rival groups, one which long predates humanity.

How could the maximum number of new species emerge in the least time possible?  This is known: a mass extinction would be needed, one which leaves a small (but large enough) percentage of humanity alive, and fertile. This would open numerous ecological niches which we, and other extant species, would rapidly fill, by rapid speciation, into an amazing variety of forms. Again, this simply happens — that does not mean it is to be desired, and I am certainly not hoping for it to happen soon. I simply realize that it has happened before, and we have no reason to think it will not happen again.

About RobertLovesPi

I go by RobertLovesPi on-line, and am interested in many things. The majority of these things are geometrical. Welcome to my little slice of the Internet. The viewpoints and opinions expressed on this website are my own. They should not be confused with the views of my employer, nor any other organization, nor institution, of any kind.
This entry was posted in Asperger's, Life, Science and Scientists and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Speculation Regarding Future Human Speciation, Part II

  1. Homo Povertus and Homo Cyberneticus seem like interesting possibilities but are they really likely? For them to become their own species, they would have to live in isolation for a million years or so, which is quite unlikely right?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. This kind of informed speculation is more relevant now than ever considering the impending climate crisis we are facing (as yet unrealized by the general populace, I might add) which Elizabeth Kolbert has dubbed “The Sixth Extinction.” Although I do not foresee the immediate end of Homo sapiens, it is difficult to imagine the continuance of modern civilization much beyond the 21st century. Recently, I compared the U.N.’s world population projection of 11 billion people in the year 2100 versus the IPCC’s global food production projections (Fourth Assessment Working Group) for the remainder of this century. I concluded, using the most optimistic likely scenario, that the world population in 2100 would be limited to 7 billion – roughly equivalent to today’s population. The more pessimistic scenarios paint a much more dire picture.

    Assuming a depopulation scenario, speciation along the lines of “homo plutocraticus” and “homo povertus” seems plausible. The former would isolate itself from the latter out of a perceived necessity, akin to the H.G. Wells classic science-fiction “The Time Machine,” and evolution would lead to genetic divergence.

    Regarding speciation from space colonization, I ventured into this prospect with my sci-fi novel. It portrayed humans on Mars as physically taller and thinner (due to lower gravity), as well as experiencing psychological and sociological changes resulting from the need to behave in a more collective manner (self-interest would prove disastrous in a marginal environment).

    Another biological factor which is getting more scientific attention lately is hybridization. For example, recent genetic research indicates that Homo neanderthalensis interbred with Homo sapiens to some extent (up to 3+ percent of the current human genome).

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s