We’ve all seen labels like this, stuck to gasoline pumps. While filling up my car’s gas tank earlier today, I felt compelled to take a picture of this familiar label — because I suddenly realized that what this small sign actually means is that the alcohol content of the gasoline being sold (in an area where liquor sales are illegal, no less) might be as much as twenty proof.
Twenty proof gasoline. Twenty proof gasoline! One never thinks of it this way, but it is both mathematically and chemically accurate. There are many different alcohols, but the one people drink for purposes of intoxication, and the one found in this gasoline, are the exact same molecule: C2H5OH. I then realized that the people who design these labels are being sneaky with the wording on purpose, for they don’t put “contains alcohol,” or anything like that, on these stickers found on gas pumps all over the place.
The reason for use of the official, less-familiar chemical term “ethanol” then became both obvious, and horrifying, all at once. Gas pumps must be labeled this way because there are people out there who are so incredibly stupid that they would actually drink gasoline if they knew it contained, well, booze.
What’s more, there is an unwritten assumption in play here, and I think (or at least hope) it is a valid one: anyone sufficiently educated to know that “ethanol” and the “the alcohol people drink to get drunk” are synonyms is also, presumably, smart enough to know better than to drink gasoline. Drinking gasoline would, of course, be dangerous in the extreme. Even inhaling gasoline fumes is hazardous, but drinking the stuff would be far worse. Consuming enough of this ethanol-containing gasoline to actually get drunk would, in fact, very likely be fatal, due to the mixture of toxic hydrocarbons present, in addition to the alcohol. The most toxic component of gasoline with which I am familiar is benzene, a potent carcinogen. Benzene is really nasty stuff, if it somehow makes it into a human body.
So, for the record, do not drink the up-to-twenty-proof gasoline — even though that is an accurate way to describe it.
Good reason to stick with water! But what do you know about water? I’ll bet you have some interesting thoughts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here you go! https://robertlovespi.wordpress.com/2014/04/29/on-the-varieties-of-heavy-water/
LikeLike
OK, you have moved up to Dr. Pi. I mean, you were already there, but I just didn’t realize how MUCH you were there!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now you’re embarrassing me!
LikeLike
No way! I am in awe of your brain. So this isn’t the right post, but have you considered making your transformations into a video? I especially liked when it went ‘inside out’ to my eyes. Those images were so compelling!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Again, enjoy! This has not only polyhedra, but also music by a fantastic band I’ve seen in concert six times now. https://robertlovespi.wordpress.com/2014/08/03/music-video-murder-by-deaths-those-who-stayed-im-afraid-of-whos-afraid-of-virginia-woolf/
There is also a “tour” feature on the polyhedron-manipulation software I use which (I think) can be used to make silent .gif files with transformations. The author of that software has encouraged me to give it a try, and I’ll probably do that soon. The video I just gave you a link to was simply assembled using Windows Movie Maker, or whatever it’s called, uploaded to YouTube, and then posted here. My guess is that Stella 4d’s “tour” feature will be much easier — once I take the time to teach myself how to use it.
Also, if you like seeing things turn inside out, you’ll probably like this post, as well as others on this blog featuring 4-dimensional polytopes rotating in hyperspace — https://robertlovespi.wordpress.com/2013/10/27/120-undulating-dodecahedra/ — and you can likely find some of those others as suggested, similar posts, at the bottom of that one.
LikeLike