The 22.5-67.5-90 Triangle

Image

22p5-67p5-90-triangle corrrected

In the diagram above, a regular octagon is shown nested inside square LMNP. The central angles of this octagon, such as angle HAF, each measure 360/8 = 45 degrees. Segments HA and FA are radii, and G is the midpoint of HF, making GF a half-side and GA an apothem. Since this apothem bisects angle HAF, angle GAF is 22.5 degrees, making the yellow triangle a 22.5-67.5-90 triangle.

Let FH = 2, as well as FK (and the other six sides of the regular octagon, as well), and GF would then equal 1, since G is the midpoint of FH. Triangle KNF is a 45-45-90 triangle with hypotenuse length 2, giving it a leg length of 2/√2, or simply √2. This makes segment XN (with X the midpoint of EK) have a length of 1 + √2, and the light blue segment, AG, has this same length of 1 + √2, by horizontal translation to the left.

The hypotenuse of the yellow 22.5-67.5-90 triangle can then be found using the Pythagorean theorem, since it is is known that the short leg (GF) has a length of 1, while the long leg (AG) has a length of 1+√2. Let this hypotenuse (AF, shown in red) be x, and then x2 = 12 + (1 + √2)2 = 1 + 1 + 2√2 + 2 = 4 + 2√2, so x, and therefore the hypotenuse, has a length of √(4+2√2).

The 22.5-67.5-90 triangle, therefore, has a short leg:long leg:hypotenuse ratio of 1:1+√2:√(4+2√2).

Starry Icosidodecahedron

Image

Starry Icosidodecahedron

This was created using Geometer’s Sketchpad, MS-Paint, and Stella 4d.

If you’d like to try Stella 4d for yourself, please visit www.software3d.com/stella.php.

Eighteen Stars

Image

Thirty Stars

A Proof

Image

A Proof

I ran into a problem at a meeting of teachers, yesterday, which exposed an embarrassing hole in my geometrical knowledge — and so I quickly became obsessed with filling it. In the diagram, the large triangle is right, and the leg lengths were given; the problem was to find the length of the hypotenuse (also the diameter of the circle centered at B). The median seen here was not shown, however, and no right angle was identified. Were the triangle not a right triangle, this would be an impossible problem, so I knew it had to be a right triangle . . . but that didn’t satisfy me. I had to have a proof, so I wrote one.

Here it is: in the diagram shown, segment AC is a diameter of a circle with center B, while D is any point on the triangle distinct from A and C. Segments BA, BD, and BC are all radii of the same circle, and therefore have the same length, making triangles ABD and CBD isosceles with bases, respectively, of AD and CD.

Let the measure of angle ABD be some number x. Since it forms a linear pair with angle CBD, angle CBD’s measure must be 180 – x.

Angles BAD and BDA are the base angles of isosceles triangle ABD, which has a vertex angle measure already chosen as x. Since these base angles must be congruent, it follows from the triangle sum theorem that each of these angles must measure (180 – x)/2.

Angles BCD and BDC are the base angles of isosceles triangle CBD, which has a vertex angle measure already determines to be 180 – x. Since these base angles must be congruent, it follows from the triangle sum theorem that each of these angles must measure (180 – (180 – x))/2.

By the angle sum theorem, the measure of angle ADC must equal the sum of the measures of angles BDC and BDA, already shown, respectively, to be (180 – (180 – x))/2 and (180 – x)/2.

Angle ADC’s measure therefore equals (180 – (180 – x))/2 + (180 – x)/2, which simplifies to (180 – 180 + x)/2 + (180 – x)/2, which further simplifies to x/2 + (180 – x)/2. Adding these two fractions yields the sum (x + 180 – x)/2, and then the “x”s cancel, leaving only 180/2, or 90 degrees, for the measure of angle ADC. Therefore. triangle ADC, the large triangle in the diagram, must be a right triangle — QED.

I’m rather embarrassed that I didn’t already know this property of inscribed triangles with one side being the diameter of the triangle’s circumscribed circle — but at least I figured the proof out myself, and that, in turn, made the faculty meeting easily the least boring one I have ever attended.

Crescents on a Truncated Octahedron

Image

Crescents on a Truncated Octahedron

Stella 4d (polyhedral manipulation software) was used to place the image in the previous post on each hexagonal face of a truncated octahedron, and the square faces were hidden. The program can do many other things as well — and you may try it for free at http://www.software3d.com/stella.php.

Sunrise Dodecahedron

Image

Sunrise Dodecahedron

Stella 4d (polyhedral manipulation software) was used to place the image in the previous post on each face of a dodecahedron. The program can do many other things as well — and you may try it for free at http://www.software3d.com/stella.php.

The Rhombic Enneacontahedron, with Mandalas

Image

The Rhombic Enneacontahedron, with Mandalas

The rhombic enneacontahedron has ninety faces. In this image, the sixty of them which are wide rhombi are decorated with the mandala, 22, from my last post. The narrow rhombi, of which there are thirty, are colored light blue.

This was created using Stella 4d, which you can try for yourself at http://www.software3d.com/stella.php.

22

Image

22

This patterns consists of 22 each of two different types of heptagrams, as well as 22 regular heptagons and 22 circles.

Here’s some music for it, by The Flaming Lips: “When Yer Twenty-Two.”

Icosidodecahedron / Rhombic Triacontahedron Compound

Image

Icosidodecahedron / Rhombic Triacontahedron Compound

The icosidodecahedron and the rhombic triacontahedron, duals to each other, are the shapes with red edges showing. I made this using Stella 4d, which you may try for free at http://www.software3d.com/stella.php.

24 Kites, Flying in a Whirlwind

Image

24 Kites, Flying in a Whirlwind

To create this using Stella 4d (see http://www.software3d.com/stella.php for free trial demo), I started with a snub cube, added it to its own mirror image, stellated it several times, and then rendered the square faces invisible.