The Hextrated Pentagonal Icositetrahedron

Image

The Hextrated Pentagonal Icositetrahedron

Years ago, I split a dodecahedron into four panels of pentagons, rotated the pentagon-panels and moved them outward from the center, and did so just the right amount to create gaps that could be filled with triangles. Thus was named the tetrated dodecahedron, which you can read more about here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrated_dodecahedron

The choice of word “tetrated” was somewhat unfortunate, for tetration already exists in mathematics, as a means of expressing very large numbers, and which I shall not explain here. I didn’t learn this until much later, though, and by that time, it was too late to turn “tetrate” into something else. It had come to mean an operation one does on a polyhedron: break it into four multi-face panels, move them out and rotate them just enough, and fill the resulting gaps with triangles.

As such, “tetrate” can, in the geometrical sense, be modified for differing numbers of panels of multiple faces from a polyhedron. Consider the pentagonal icositetrahedron, the dual of the snub cube. Here, it has been split into six panels, and then each panel moved out from the center and rotated, with triangles filling the gaps. The triangles differ between color-groups slightly, but are close to equilateral, except for the ones shown in green, which simply are equilateral.

(Image created with Stella 4d — software you can try yourself at http://www.software3d.com/Stella.php.)

The Dual of the Convex Hull of the Compound of the Snub Cube and Its Dual, the Pentagonal Icositetrahedron

Image

The Dual of the Convex Hull of the Compound of the Snub Cube and Its Dual, the Pentagonal Icositetrahedron

This is the dual of the polyhedron seen in the last post. It appears to be an interesting blend of the snub cube and an icosidodecahedron.

(Image created with Stella 4d — software you can try yourself at http://www.software3d.com/Stella.php.)

The Convex Hull of the Compound of the Snub Cube and Its Dual, the Pentagonal Icositetrahedron

Image

The Convex Hull of the Compound of the Snub Cube and Its Dual, the Pentagonal Icositetrahedron

(Image created with Stella 4d — software you can try yourself at http://www.software3d.com/Stella.php.)

The Sixth Stellation of the Triakis Octahedron

Image

The Sixth Stellation of the Triakis Octahedron

The triakis octahedron, a Catalan solid, is the dual of the truncated cube. When stellated six times, the triakis octahedron yields this polyhedral compound with three parts. The parts themselves appear to be unusual, irregular, dipolar octahedra with eight kites for faces, each in sets of four, with their smallest angles meeting at one vertex. However, given that these vertices are, in each case, hidden under the other parts of the compound, there is uncertainty in this.

(Image created with Stella 4d — software you can try yourself at http://www.software3d.com/Stella.php.)

On the Geography of Eurasia, and Its Major Divisions

Image

On the Geography of Eurasia, and Its Major Divisions

By any reasonable non-political definition, Eurasia is a single continent. Its area is 54,759,000 km², which is over one-third the earth’s total land area.

The politics of history have created, however, the “continents” of Europe, with an area of 10,180,000 km² (18.59% of Eurasia), and Asia, with an area of 44,579,000 km² (81.41% of Eurasia). These figures for Asia’s land area include that of the “subcontinent,” India, which has an area of 4,400,000 km². (Note: the subcontinent of India is a geographical term, and does not match the borders of the nation of India perfectly. The major reason for this is that India the subcontinent includes the nations of Pakistan and Bangladesh, in addition to the politically-defined nation of India.)  The subcontinent’s area is 8.04 % that of Eurasia, and 9.87% that of Asia.

Europe is a large peninsula, a part of Eurasia with a sizeable portion of its area. So is the Indian subcontinent. So, for that matter, are the Southern portions of both South America and Africa, yet no one calls them separate continents, nor even subcontinents.

Giving India a special designation of “subcontinent” makes no sense, nor does the designation of Europe as a separate continent. Both are simply parts of Eurasia.

A Half-Solved Mystery: Rotating a Sine Wave

Image

A Half-Solved Mystery

A few minutes ago, I wondered how to write a function whose graph would be a sine curve, but one that undulated above and below the diagonal line y=x, rather than the x-axis, as is usually the case. How to accomplish such a 45 degree counterclockwise rotation?

Well, first, I abandoned degrees, set Geometer’s Sketchpad to radians, and then simply constructed plots for both y = x and y = sin(x). Next, I added them together. The result is the green curve (and equation) you see above.

This only half-solves the problem. Does it undulate above and below y=x? Yes, it does. However, if you rotate this whole thing, clockwise, one-eighth of a complete turn, so that you are looking at the green curve going along the x-axis, you’ll notice that it is not a true sine curve, but a distorted one. Why? Because it was generated by adding y-values along the original x-axis, not by a true rotation.

I’m not certain how to correct for this distortion, or otherwise solve the problem. If anyone has a suggestion, please leave it in a comment. [Note: an astute follower of this blog has now done exactly that, so I refer the reader to the comments for the rest of the story here.]

Basic Trigonometric Functions, Viewed On a Polar Coordinate System

Image

Basic Trigonometric Functions, Viewed On a Polar Coordinate System

The last post made me curious about other trigonometric functions’ graphs, in a polar coordinate system. They were not what I expected. Here they are.

When A Sine Wave Is a Circle

Image

When A Sine Wave Is a Circle

When y=sin(x) is plotted on a polar coordinate system, with everything set, consistently, to radians, the resulting graph is a circle sitting atop the origin, with unit diameter.

Spin

Image

Spin

The Deconstruction of the Compound of Five Cubes

An Examination of the Compound of Five Cubes

To make the compound of five cubes, begin with a dodecahedron, as seen above. Next, add segments as new edges, and let them be all of the diagonals of all the dodecahedron’s faces. Then, remove the pentagonal faces, as well as the original edges. What’s left is five cubes, in this arrangement.

Cubes 5

Using polyhedral manipulation software called Stella 4d (available at www.software3d.com/Stella.php), these five cubes can be removed one at a time. The first removal has this result:

Cubes 5-1

That left four cubes, so the next removal leaves three:

Cubes 5-2

And then only two:

Cubes 5-3

And, finally, only one remains:

Cubes 5-4

Because their edges were pentagon-diagonals for the original dodecahedron, each of these cubes has an edge length equal to the Golden Ratio, (1 + √5)/2, times the edge length of that dodecahedron.