On Sportsball, As Viewed By One Aspie

Image

On the Varieties of Sportsball

Since I live in the American South, I hear a lot of talk about about sportsball. I have a hard time, though, telling exactly which variety of sportsball is being discussed. I don’t find sportsball interesting, and so I’m not fluent in any variant of sportsball jargon. For that reason, it can be difficult for me to tell which sportsballspeak-dialect is being used.

So, sometimes, just to try to make friendly conversation (while still being myself), I ask sportsball-fans questions, in order to find out which version they’re so intently discussing. (Figuring out why people obsessively talk about sportsball so much, I think, is a mystery I’ll never solve. Understanding the strange behavior of non-Aspies is much more difficult than the types of problems I enjoy trying to solve. As Albert Einstein said, when declining the presidency of Israel, “I have no head for human problems.”)

Here’s an example of one such question: “Are you talking about the type of sportsball often played inside, with a bunch of people chasing an orange sphere around on a wooden rectangle, and trying to get the sphere to pass through a metallic, elevated circle of slightly larger diameter than the sphere itself?”

Now, if someone mentions the sportsball game most people call “football,” there’s an obvious follow-up question that needs to be asked . . . so, of course, I ask it:  “Which one?”

Replies to that question usually go something like this: “Whaddya mean, which one? Football! We’re talking about football, ya nerd!”

“But there are at least two games called by that name, which confuses me. Do you mean the sportsball-version where the players chase a prolate spheroid, or a rounded version of a truncated icosahedron?”

If they don’t understand that question, I attempt clarification: “You know, both those versions of sportsball are played on rectangles covered with grass . . . but the one with the prolate spheroid has two giant tuning forks at opposite sides end of the grassy rectangle, is usually played in the USA, and has a far higher rate of injuries, even fatal ones. The one that uses a truncated icosahedron doesn’t have tuning forks, is called ‘football’ by far more people than that American game, and isn’t nearly as dangerous. I think it’s at least a little more interesting than that other game people call ‘football,’ because of the Archimedean solid they chase around, since I like polyhedra. Which one are you discussing?”

If they tell me they’re talking about American football, I usually follow-up with a brief rant, for that sportsball-variant’s name confuses me. “Why do people call it that, anyway? I’ve seen it being play a few times — not for a full game, of course, but I can stand to watch it for a few minutes. That’s long enough to tell that the players only rarely use their feet to kick the prolate spheroid, and usually carry or throw it instead, using, of course, their hands. They usually use their feet just to run around chasing each other. Calling that version of sportsball by the term ‘football’ doesn’t make sense at all. In the game the rest of the world calls ‘football,’ the players kick the ball all the time, so I can understand why it has that name, but that prolate-spheroid version really should be called something else! Also, why are the games sometimes called ‘bowl games?’ They still play on a rectangle, and chase a prolate spheroid — there’s no actual bowl involved, is there?”

On occasion, they aren’t talking about any of these three varieties, though, but yet another form of sportsball. (Why are there so many?)

baseball

“Oh! You must mean the one played on a ninety-degree sector of a circle, with a square (confusingly called a ‘diamond,’ for some reason) in its interior, positioned such that one of its vertices is at the circle’s center. At that vertex, there’s a convex-but-still-irregular pentagon on the ground, while the other three vertices of the large, grass-covered square have much smaller squares on the ground, instead of a pentagon. The guy standing at the pentagon is always trying to hit a red-and-white sphere with a wooden or aluminum stick, but he usually misses. The guy who throws the sphere toward the region above that pentagon usually scratches himself, and spits — a lot. He must be important in some way, for he’s provided with a small hill to stand on, literally placing him above the rest of the players. Have I got it now?”

Sometimes, people try to get me to stop calling these strange activities “sportsball,” by bringing up hockey as an objection. “You can’t call all sports ‘sportsball!’ What about hockey? It doesn’t even have ball! It’s got a puck!”

I’m always ready for this objection, though. “You mean the one with the short black cylinder that slides across ice? That’s a sport? I thought it was just an excuse to have fights!”

Thank You, Coca-Cola Inc., for Promoting Archimedean Solid Awareness!

Image

Thank You, Coca-Cola Inc., for Promoting Archimedean Solid Awareness!

I was delighted to see that cans of Coca-Cola® now on sale feature a picture of a truncated icosahedron. This is real progress!

A Truncated Icosahedron / Dodecahedron Blend

Image

A Truncated Icosahedron / Dodecahedron Blend

I used Stella 4d, software you can find at http://www.software3d.com/Stella.php, to make this image.

A Truncated Icosahedron with Sixty Extra Hexagons

Image

A Truncated Icosahedron with Sixty Extra Hexagons

I created this using Stella 4d, which is available (including a free trial download) at http://www.software3d.com/Stella.php. With adjustments in edge lengths to make the bond lengths correct, this would be the shape of a C180 fullerene molecule.

If the thirty-two faces of the truncated icosahedron are hidden, and only the sixty extra hexagons are visible, this polyhedron looks like this:

Dual of Geodesic Trunc Icosa

In “rainbow color mode,” it has an even more interesting appearance:

Dual of Geodesic Trunc Icosa

My name made the “Stella 4d” library discovery credits!

Image

My name made the Stella library discovery credits!

Stella’s creator just came out with a new version of Stella 4d, and a discovery of mine made the built-in library that comes with that software. This is my blog, so I get to brag about that, right? My legal name appears in the small print on the right side, at the end of the first long paragraph. I added the red ellipses to make it easier to find.

You can see the earlier posts related to my discovery of this zonish truncated icosahedron here:

https://robertlovespi.wordpress.com/2013/05/10/a-new-near-miss-to-the-92-johnson-solids/

https://robertlovespi.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/a-second-version-of-my-new-near-miss/

If you’d like to try (as a free trial) or buy this software (I recommend Stella 4d over the other available options), here’s the link for that: http://www.software3d.com/Stella.php.

Compound of a Slightly-Truncated Isocahedron and a Rhombic Triacontahedron

Image

Compound of a Slightly-Truncated Isocahedron and a Rhombic Triacontahedron

Software used: Stella 4d, available at http://www.software3d.com/Stella.php (including a free “try it before you buy it” trial download).

The Pseudo-Truncated-Icosahedron

Image

Continue reading

Link

Spinning Truncated Icosahedron

I don’t reblog things here, but I do appreciate getting e-mail from my followers, and I don’t mind posting an occasional link. One of them, a gentleman named Donald, sent me this link to an interesting video of a spinning truncated icosahedron, viewed from both the inside and outside, and set to music. To see it, simply follow the link above. Thanks for the tip, Donald — this is a really cool video!

Icosahedral Cluster of Truncated Icosahedra

Image

Icosahedral Cluster of Truncated Icosahedra

Software credit: see http://www.software3d.com/stella.php.

An Expansion of the Truncated Icosahedron — and, Perhaps, a New Near-Miss

Image

An Expansion of the Truncated Icosahedron -- and, Perhaps, a New Near-Miss

To create this using Stella 4d (see http://www.software3d.com/stella.php), I started with a truncated icosahedron, augmented each of its faces with a prism that was 1.5 times as tall as the base edge length, and took the convex hull of the result. It may qualify as a near-miss to the Johnson Solids — for that to be the case, all faces would have to be close to regular, but “close to” has no precise definition. I’ll have to consult with the experts on this one!